Comparing boatyard lift-out quotes

Send every yard the same brief

Prepare one enquiry describing the yacht, intended tasks, preferred dates and expected duration. Give the dimensions and weight information requested, including the source and uncertainty of each figure. Explain whether the visit involves a survey, coating work, machinery repairs or a combination. Otherwise each yard may price a different assumption and the resulting totals will appear comparable when the underlying services are not.

Separate the essential scope from optional items. For example, request the core underwater inspection visit first, then ask for a separately identified allowance for an additional detailing task. Tell suppliers which work has already been specified by a professional and which needs diagnosis. A quotation should not be forced into false precision where nobody has yet seen the relevant condition of the boat.

Include practical constraints such as approved external contractors or an onward departure commitment. Ask for the latest terms and a clear expiry date for the proposal. Keep a dated version of your brief beside each response. If you change the scope after one yard replies, send the same revision to the other shortlisted operators. That small discipline makes the eventual decision easier to explain and reduces the chance of selecting an attractive number based on obsolete information.

Identify exactly which movements are included

List the physical stages of the proposed visit in ordinary language: arrival, lift, cleaning if specified, positioning in the booked area, any later movement and relaunch. Ask the yard which stages are included in its total. Do not assume that a price described as haul-out includes return to the water, nor that every movement during a longer project is covered by the original appointment.

If the work may need a different bay or access arrangement, have the operator explain how that affects its proposal. The contractor should identify relevant requirements before you compare prices. Owners should not determine support changes or handling methods themselves; the commercial question is who assesses and supplies whatever arrangements the approved work requires. Clarify the charging basis without directing the operation.

A useful quote identifies conditions that would change the number of movements. Record them beside the allowance rather than treating the allowance as an unconditional fixed fee. The Boat Works lift options page demonstrates that different lifting solutions exist within one facility. It supports asking which solution the operator proposes for your vessel, not choosing a machine solely because its advertised capacity or starting price looks attractive.

Understand the time charged ashore

Ask when chargeable hardstand time starts and ends. Find out whether the operator counts calendar days, working days, partial days or another defined period. Check whether a minimum stay applies and how weekends or public holidays are treated. A simple timeline with the proposed lift and relaunch dates often exposes an ambiguity that is hard to see in a single line labelled storage.

Distinguish active work time from occupation of the space. A contractor may need only two working days while the yacht occupies the yard longer because of delivery, inspection or scheduling dependencies. The operator's charge may follow the occupation rather than the labour. Use the actual quoted terms to model the stay instead of estimating all costs from the contractor's hours.

Ask what happens if the vessel is ready early, and what happens if it needs to remain beyond the booked period. Neither a refund nor an extension should be assumed. If a relaunch slot must be reserved separately, include it in the comparison. The hardstand work-period guide helps link bookings to readiness so the budget reflects a workable sequence rather than the shortest imaginable stay.

Separate yard charges from trade charges

Identify who will invoice each part of the project. Some yards coordinate work under one proposal, while others provide space to independent businesses that contract separately. Ask whether the quoted total includes trade labour, materials, specialist attendance and project coordination or only the facility. A list of on-site trades does not establish that the yard has booked them or accepted responsibility for their work.

Where separate businesses are involved, ask about their availability before assuming the quoted yard dates will suit. Record travel, attendance or minimum charges where these apply. Check who is responsible for access arrangements and who approves any variation. The objective is not to create an elaborate procurement process; it is to know which price belongs to which obligation and who can answer a question about it.

Keep owner-supplied items visible in the cost sheet. Their purchase price may sit outside the contractor's proposal, but compatibility checks, fitting and commissioning still require agreement. Do not deduct a supplied part from a bundled quotation without asking for a revised scope. A clear split between facility, professional work and owner purchases reveals the true project budget and prevents one category from disappearing when you compare totals.

Check services and environmental arrangements

Ask which services are included with the booked work space and which are metered, hired or billed separately. Depending on the yard and project, questions may concern power, water, approved access equipment, waste handling, delivery storage or additional work areas. Let the operator identify relevant charges from your scope rather than sending a generic list and assuming every item applies.

Environmental management can affect both suitability and cost. Explain proposed cleaning, coating or repair activities and ask who supplies the approved containment and disposal arrangements. The Marina Industries Association audit topics include waste and maintenance activities. Use that context to make responsibilities explicit; a general environmental badge does not tell you whether the quoted amount covers your particular work.

Request clarification where an item is described only as sundries or environmental fee. The answer may be straightforward, but you need to know whether it is fixed, estimated or linked to usage. Avoid substituting a cheaper unapproved method to reduce the total. The fair comparison is between complete proposals capable of supporting the intended work under each site's conditions, including the less visible services that make the visit practical.

Compare access and travel costs

A yard farther from home can still be the better choice if it has the required expertise and availability. Make the additional costs visible so the decision is deliberate. Consider the vessel's trip, owner travel, accommodation, local transport and the attendance of any external specialist. These are project planning estimates rather than yard charges, and they should be labelled separately in the comparison.

Check whether you may stay aboard or visit outside ordinary hours before using either assumption in the budget. Ask about parking, delivery access and storage of removed equipment. A berth before or after the hardstand period may need its own reservation and charge. If the project requires commissioning afloat, identify where it will happen rather than assuming the boat can depart immediately after relaunch.

Time matters alongside money. A location that allows a prompt owner inspection of a discovery may reduce delays, while a remote project can work well with agreed reporting and decision authority. Compare the arrangement you can realistically manage. The marina refit guide explores facility choice when several work environments and trade packages must fit together, which can be more important than a small difference in lifting cost.

Build a delay scenario using quoted terms

Create a second version of the budget for a plausible delay. Choose the scenario from the actual project, such as a part arriving late or an inspection identifying further work. Ask which charges would continue, which new charges could arise and whether the site can accommodate an extension. This is a sensitivity check, not a prediction that every visit will overrun.

Do not apply an arbitrary contingency percentage and treat the planning as complete. A percentage can reserve money, but it does not answer where the yacht stays or when the next lift is available. Identify decision dates before costs increase or a booked space becomes unavailable. If the yard cannot promise an extension, record that limitation and discuss the practical alternatives while there is time to choose.

Make responsibility for communicating delays explicit. A contractor changing its work date may not automatically inform the yard office or the surveyor. The person coordinating the project should update all affected bookings and ask for revised confirmation. Keep the original and changed totals in the file. This makes it possible to distinguish a genuine scope change from an unexplained increase when the final account arrives.

Read exclusions and approval rules closely

Read the quotation's exclusions before concentrating on the total. An exclusion is not necessarily a problem; it tells you what another person must supply or what cannot yet be priced. Turn each relevant exclusion into a question with an owner. If a service is essential to completion, find its provider and obtain a price or a clearly identified estimate before accepting the overall plan.

Ask how additional work is proposed and authorised. Agree what information you expect before approval: the reason, scope, charging basis and scheduling effect. For shared ownership, nominate the authorised contact. Do not rely on several people independently telling trades to do what is needed. Commercial clarity can preserve flexibility while ensuring that an urgent conversation does not become an unlimited instruction.

Review insurance and contractual requirements with your insurer or adviser where necessary. This guide cannot determine what a clause means for a particular claim or policy. Ask the operator to explain unclear wording and obtain advice on material concerns before booking. Keep evidence of the version accepted, including attachments referenced by the quote. A comparison that ignores terms can make two proposals seem equivalent even when their responsibilities and assumptions differ substantially.

Use a decision sheet instead of a price ranking

Build a short comparison with one row for each important question and a column for each yard. Record confirmed inclusions, exclusions, unresolved points and the evidence behind them. Use words such as awaiting clarification rather than entering zero for an unknown cost. A blank cell is a question; it should not silently make one supplier appear cheaper than another.

Include non-price requirements that could rule out a proposal, such as vessel acceptance, appropriate work space or confirmed specialist availability. The yacht's beam, configuration and current condition need the operator's assessment regardless of the fee. Mark these as prerequisites rather than awarding a few points that could be outweighed by a discount. Suitability should be established before choosing among commercially acceptable options.

Once prerequisites are satisfied, compare the complete likely cost and the delayed scenario alongside convenience and coordination. Document why the preferred option works for your project. You do not need a complicated scoring model to make a sound choice. A clear page showing the scope, assumptions and outstanding questions is often enough to reveal whether the lowest headline charge remains attractive after everything necessary is included.

Close the comparison with a revised confirmation

Send the preferred operator a concise summary of the arrangement you believe you are accepting. Include the current scope, dates, vessel information, selected options and any clarifications that affected your decision. Ask for a revised quotation or written confirmation where those details were not in the original document. A telephone explanation is useful, but a consistent written record prevents later uncertainty.

Check the payment schedule and what must happen before the booking becomes firm. Put reminders beside the actual dates and confirm the method for sending requested records. Tell other suppliers promptly when their quotations are no longer being considered, especially if someone has provisionally held a slot. Keep communication factual and avoid making competing suppliers responsible for guessing your changing plans.

Before arrival, revisit the accepted assumptions. If the boat's condition, work scope or dates have changed, ask whether the proposal needs updating. The haul-out preparation guide turns the accepted commercial plan into an organised handover. A good comparison finishes with a practical booking that everyone understands, not simply a spreadsheet declaring one price the winner while essential conditions remain unresolved.

Compare your options

Swipe across the table to compare every column →